DART mission by NASA to move an asteroid and change the relationship with the solar system

DART mission by NASA to move an asteroid and change the relationship with the solar system

The dinosaurs didn’t have a space agency; if they had, perhaps they would still be here, would-be astronauts. Planetary defenders occasionally make jokes about their efforts to avoid an asteroid collision.

The goal of planetary defence is to locate any asteroids that are on their way to do major damage to Earth and, if necessary, to deflect the rock. Planetary defence scientists frequently state that such an impact is the only natural tragedy that may be avoided.

The 1,210-pound (550-kilogram) DART spacecraft will collide with an asteroid named Dimorphos in late September or early October 2022. Scientists will be keeping a close eye on the impact to see how much it accelerates the space rock’s orbit around its larger partner Didymos. It’s the first concrete evidence of what it may take to redirect a dangerous asteroid away from Earth.

However, considering reorganising the solar system necessitates not just looking ahead, but also backward to assess how human history can influence such a move. This includes whether or not it will be created differently.


“Even the ability to transport, exploit, destroy, or transform natural capital such as rocks and asteroids is ultimately based on an imperial perspective. It considers humans to be free to do anything they desire “According to Armstrong.

What all is on the Plate?

Where can we draw the line between pleasant curiosity and something more serious if we humans prefer to meddle? This line may differ on the basis of the magnitude of the effect on orbital dynamics but the one who is deciding for planetary defence.

The DART mission, in particular, involves international cooperation because it is the result of years of negotiation between NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA). The two agencies initially considered a cooperative effort; the DART mission, as it will be launched, will contain an Italian cubesat and be followed by an ESA mission called Hera. Later this decade, Hera will examine the wreckage more closely.

DART is a meticulously planned mission, and its target was chosen in part because scientists believe the mission will not force the rocks to collide with Earth. However, if something goes wrong on a true planetary defence mission, the consequences might be dire, turning a natural disaster into a social tragedy rather than averting anything, according to Olson.

“This is a step-by-step procedure,” Olson explained, “and the step that calls itself a practice phase where nothing can go wrong is only one step toward the next step.”

One Major Challenge seen

Perhaps the most vocal issue revolves around how governments, agencies, and the general public prioritise certain calamities. No of how the future turns out, the DART mission’s conceptualization and outreach reflect a reckoning of today’s threats that is not ubiquitous.

“Most languages around this effort is about how will the Earth face these crisis, says Armstrong contrasting the planetary defence strategy decisiveness with stumbling attempts in the US and elsewhere to handle, example, the climate catastrophe.

The DART mission isn’t exactly a money pit, costing $330 million. NASA’s Earth Science Division has an annual budget of roughly $2 billion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *